Given data set i have applied both Random Forest and SVM.But Random Forest is giving more accuracy than SVM. I want the reason behind it?
It would help, if you can provide some details on features you have used / created.
In general, it is hard to predict which algorithm would do better over other with out understanding the data and features, if both the algorithms are available.
In my data set totally i have 12 features and 10886 observations. About the features datetime,season, holiday,workingday,weather temp,atemp,humidity,windspeed ,casual,registered,count(causal+registered)
In the test set we have to predict the count.Firstly i have done preprocess on training data and then apply the Random Forest algoritham and SVM.But Random Forest is giving more accuracy.if u need any information i can give.
SVM is usually applied for a classification problem. This is a regression problem.
SVM can also be applicable for regression.In data set some features are having categorical and some features are having continuous values. Thats why i have applied SVM.